Ethereum Classic Community Call #51
Logtrees
Key Points Discussed
- ETC GrantsDAO and Antpool have both signed nolympia.dev, formally registering opposition to Olympia from the largest grant funder and a major mining pool
- antsankov reopened the ECIP-1049 question with core-geth PR #698, implementing a switch from Etchash to Keccak with no accompanying discussion
- Codeaholic presented “Elysium,” a foil ECIP to Olympia that would route the base fee into utility-driving smart contracts rather than a DAO treasury
- Codeaholic demonstrated Log Trees, a pre-alpha map-based application powered by his Log N algorithm, framed in a “carbon-negative blockchain” white paper and deployed to both ETC and ETH
- Istora shared a closely overlapping “nourishment” design splitting benefactors, validators, and action-takers as separate roles, and the two agreed to collaborate rather than duplicate work
- Discussion explored verification strategies (geo-positioning, peer “laser tag” validators, human attestation) and how to avoid Sybil attacks without requiring on-chain GPS proofs
- Several upstream client releases remain blockers: go-ethereum 1.17.3 is still pending, Nethermind 1.71.1 needed a custom build to patch a PoW deadlock, Besu PRs are still under review, and Safe has not yet merged 1.4.1 for Mordor
- Quantum-security ECIP, Mythos audit, based-rollup follow-up, exchange outreach, and other agenda items were deferred as the Elysium discussion ran to the hour mark
Full AI Summary and Transcript ↓
Preamble
Hello, and Welcome!
This community call is an open voice chat discussion about Ethereum Classic. Everyone is welcome.
The call will be published on YouTube. We kindly ask that discussion stays focused on ideas rather than individuals. Let’s keep it classy.
The Next Call is Scheduled for 15th May. Join us in the Green Room on Zoom 1 hour before the call for an unrecorded hangout, same time, same place.
Find past episodes, transcripts, subscribe to calendar, and more at https://cc.ethereumclassic.org.
Today’s Agenda
Last call covered a lot of philosophical ground. This week we’ll catch up on development progress, news since the last call, pull request activity, and follow up on action items and open questions.
Introductions
Quick round of introductions for everyone on the call, and if there’s anything you want to talk about.
ETC in the News
- KuCoin published an Ethereum vs. Ethereum Classic 2026 guide on April 25, framing ETC as the original chain with a fixed-supply, “Code is Law” narrative. The piece notes ETC trading around $8.37 as of April 20 with a market cap near $1.31B, and references the upcoming “fifthening” block-reward reduction expected in late 2026. Worth flagging as a high-traffic outlet covering ETC favourably without Olympia framing.
Pull Request Corner
ECIPs
- No new PRs since last call
- The action item from call 50 to publish a fresh ECIP-1121 alternative (without Olympia, without EIP-7935) is still outstanding. Should we draft it together during the call?
core-geth
- PR #698 opened by antsankov on April 28: Implement ECIP-1049 (switch PoW from Etchash to Keccak). What is the community’s appetite for revisiting ECIP-1049 in the current fork debate?
ethereumclassic.org
- No merges since last call
ETC Cooperative Development Update
- Nethermind released 1.71.1, but a custom build was needed because that release is missing a master PR that fixes a deadlock on PoW chains
- Besu is still reviewing the outstanding PRs (besu-eth/besu#10220, besu-eth/besu#10235)
- go-ethereum has not yet released 1.17.3, which is the blocker for promoting go-ethereum-classic to a proper testing release
- Safe merged 1.4.1 support for ETC mainnet but has not yet merged 1.4.1 for Mordor, so the new Safe Wallet version cannot be deployed for Catacomb 1.4.1 testing
Olympia Update
The ETC Grants DAO and Antpool have both signed nolympia.dev, formally registering opposition to the Olympia treasury proposal from two of the most significant funding and mining stakeholders in the ecosystem. How does this change the calculus on chain-split risk and exchange outreach?
Last Call Recap
Action items from call 50:
- Istora: Publish new ECIP as alternative to ECIP-1121 (without Olympia) before call 51, still outstanding
- Istora: Update ECIP-1120 and publish new article on ethereumclassic.org, still outstanding
- Diego: Publish go-ethereum-classic testing release once upstream 1.17.3 is available, still blocked on upstream (see Development Update)
- Diego: Publish performance benchmarks comparing go-ethereum-classic and CoreGeth, still blocked on the above
- Community: Inform exchanges and miners about potential Olympia chain split risks, status?
- Codeaholic: Prepare quantum security ECIP discussion for call 51, on today’s agenda
Agenda
These are just some ideas for topics to get the conversation going. Feel free to jump in at any time.
Quantum Security ECIP
Codeaholic to walk through the proposed quantum resistance approach (related to ECIPs PR #557). What are the trade-offs in adding a post-quantum precompile now versus waiting for a clearer threat timeline? How would deployment interact with the rest of the next hard fork’s EIP set?
Extra Topics
Carry-over and follow-up items. Pick whichever the room has energy for.
- ECIP-1121 Alternative: If we draft a fresh ECIP this call as a successor to ECIP-1121 (no Olympia, no EIP-7935), what should be in scope? Which EIPs from the call 49 table are uncontroversial enough to bundle, and what should be deferred?
- Mythos / Security Audit: Any updates on the Mythos security audit findings, and what actions, if any, should the community take in response?
- Based Rollups Follow-Up: Citrullin’s call 50 proposal to run DAO and treasury functionality on a based rollup anchored to ETC L1 generated interest but needs more detail. What would a minimal proof-of-concept look like, and how would miner sentiment be expressed in such a system?
- Exchange and Miner Outreach: The community action item to proactively inform exchanges and miners about Olympia chain-split risks: who is doing this, and what messaging is being used? Is there a shared template or talking-point document that could be circulated?
- 1559 Funding Mechanics: At ETC’s current transaction volume, would a fee-based treasury actually receive meaningful funds, or does it only generate revenue once the chain reaches saturation?
- Miner Signalling Tools: What tools exist or could be built to better capture miner sentiment on proposed protocol changes before they reach a hard fork decision point?
- Agentic Future: Does ETC’s permissionless PoW architecture offer a better foundation for agent-driven applications than PoS chains that require identity and permission layers?
- Ossification: Should ETC adopt an explicit ossification stance, prioritising protocol stability over further upgrades?
- Network Value Index: Could the community develop a composite index (node count, developer activity, chain security) that better represents real-world network value than market cap alone?
- Being Small as Strength: Is ETC’s smaller size a liability, or does it provide resilience and focus that larger chains lack?
AI Summary
Pull Request Corner and Olympia Update
Istora opened with a quiet PR cycle and a notable shift in the Olympia opposition.
- Details
- Istora: No new ECIP PRs since last call; the action item to draft a fresh ECIP-1121 alternative remains outstanding
- Istora: core-geth PR #698 opened by antsankov on April 28 implements ECIP-1049, switching the PoW from Etchash to Keccak, with no description or comment provided
- Istora: Noted antsankov has been part of the ETC community since around 2019 and would be welcome to discuss the proposal on a future call
- Istora: ETC GrantsDAO and Antpool have both signed nolympia.dev, formally registering opposition to the Olympia treasury proposal
- Istora: Antpool is a large hash-rate mining pool and ETC GrantsDAO is currently the primary grant funder for ETC activity, making these significant signals
- Istora: Olympia authors continue to remain silent, and coordination on chain-split mitigation is becoming more pressing
- Conclusion
- The ECIP-1049 PR reopens an old debate that was previously withdrawn, and community appetite for revisiting it is unclear
- Two of the largest funding and mining stakeholders are now publicly opposed to Olympia
- Exchange and miner outreach to mitigate chain-split risk is increasingly necessary
Elysium as a Foil to Olympia
Codeaholic walked through Elysium, a counter-proposal designed to test what an alternative base-fee destination could look like.
- Details
- codeaholic: Elysium is a set of draft ECIPs that mirror Olympia’s framing but route the base fee by percentage into smart contracts rather than a treasury entity
- codeaholic: The CoreGeth code delta for Elysium is much smaller than Olympia’s, intentionally minimising client-side changes
- codeaholic: The argument is that if a base fee exists at all, it should drive utility, meaning applications that incentivize users and thereby strengthen the token
- codeaholic: Elysium does not actually require a base fee; it exists primarily as a foil to ensure that if Olympia ships, the base-fee destination is challenged rather than presupposed
- Istora: Agreed that “Olympia as the only place” for the base fee is a presupposition worth challenging, and that alternatives like Elysium expand the design space
- Conclusion
- Elysium reframes the base-fee debate from “should there be a treasury?” to “what should fees fund?”
- Presenting concrete alternatives weakens the rhetorical position that Olympia is the only viable destination for a base fee
- The proposal favours smart-contract routing over discretionary entity control
Log Trees, Log N, and the Carbon-Negative Blockchain Concept
Codeaholic demoed the application underpinning Elysium and described its economic model.
- Details
- codeaholic: Log Trees is a pre-alpha map application where users register positive actions (planting trees, tagging trash, healthy meals) as on-chain “imputables” that thrive or wither over time
- codeaholic: The Log N algorithm assigns each loggable action a measurable fiat-denominated value drawn from existing real-world cost data, producing a constrained set of non-zero-sum actions
- codeaholic: The aggregate “tree map” is the sum of all events written to the chain and is queryable as obfuscated counts to preserve user privacy
- codeaholic: Verification strategies under development include geo-positioning relative to other users and a gamified “laser tag” peer-validation layer, targeting roughly 95% reliability rather than 100%
- codeaholic: The white paper, “Carbon Negative Blockchains Via Log Trees,” frames the system as a bootstrapping function for a “productive universal basic income” grounded in modern monetary theory
- codeaholic: Log Trees is deployed to both Ethereum and Ethereum Classic and is functional but pre-alpha
- Justjin: Asked how the system would handle events like a forest fire destroying logged trees; codeaholic acknowledged this as a feature to implement rather than a current capability
- Conclusion
- Log Trees is a working but early-stage application that gives Elysium a concrete utility narrative
- Verification remains the hardest open problem, with multiple complementary strategies rather than a single solution
- The economic framing ties on-chain incentives to off-chain real-world value rather than to speculative token mechanics
Nourishment and Collaboration on a Shared Incentive System
Istora described a closely related “nourishment” design and proposed working together rather than in parallel.
- Details
- Istora: Concluded independently that objective on-chain verification (GPS, gas-heavy proofs) is too costly, and that human validators rewarded for honest attestation are a more practical path
- Istora: Proposed a three-way separation of roles: benefactors who fund, validators who approve or deny actions, and action-takers who perform them, with checks and balances between them
- Istora: The model generalises beyond planting trees to actions like attending a community call, posting a tweet, or attending a sponsored event
- Istora: Liked the Log Trees “nursery” concept as a streak-management mechanism that incentivizes sustained engagement rather than one-off actions
- codeaholic: Liked the validator-role design and proposed combining it with Log N’s quantitative basis for actions whose dollar value can be derived from existing data
- Istora: Suggested tail-end mechanisms where early adopters receive a diminishing cut of all future rewards, locking in long-term value
- Istora: Drew a direct analogy to ETC whales, whose holdings appreciate far more from funding development than the cost of that development
- Istora and codeaholic: Agreed to follow up by DM and coordinate rather than duplicate work
- Conclusion
- Two independently-developed designs converged on similar primitives (action logging, peer validation, gamified streaks, fiat-denominated value)
- Splitting funding, validation, and action-taking into distinct roles is a candidate pattern for grant-style incentive systems
- A collaborative build deployed to ETC could serve as a concrete alternative to a DAO-managed treasury
ETC Cooperative Development Update
Istora summarised the development blockers that remain since call 50.
- Details
- Istora: Nethermind released 1.71.1, but a custom build was required because that release is missing a master PR fixing a PoW-chain deadlock
- Istora: Besu PRs #10220 and #10235 are still under upstream review
- Istora: go-ethereum has not yet released 1.17.3, which blocks promoting go-ethereum-classic to a proper testing release and the associated benchmarks
- Istora: Safe merged 1.4.1 support for ETC mainnet but not for Mordor, blocking deployment of the new Safe Wallet for Catacomb 1.4.1 testing
- Conclusion
- Several call-50 action items (testing release, benchmarks) remain blocked on upstream releases rather than on ETC-side work
- Client-diversity work continues but is gated on dependencies outside ETC’s direct control
Action Items
- Istora: DM codeaholic to share current plans and explore collaboration on the nourishment / Log Trees system
- Istora: Publish ECIP-1121 alternative draft (carry-over from call 50)
- Istora: Update ECIP-1120 and publish article on ethereumclassic.org (carry-over from call 50)
- codeaholic: Continue rapid iteration on Log Trees pre-alpha and publish the verification-strategies paper
- Diego: Publish go-ethereum-classic testing release and benchmarks once upstream 1.17.3 lands (still blocked)
- Community: Continue exchange and miner outreach in light of GrantsDAO and Antpool signing nolympia.dev
- antsankov: Join a future call to explain the rationale for core-geth PR #698 reopening ECIP-1049